Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 109 of 109

Thread: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

  1. #81
    fezz parka
    Guest
    Originally posted by Tonefreak
    Ahhh yes...but when the Fezz plays live?? He's toting a tube amp as sure as I'm reading this stuff.
    The technology is going to have to get a little better before I'll give up playing the tube stuff live! :yay

  2. #82
    Forum Member yz25098uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    east london
    Posts
    424
    tonefreak , i was just giving brianf the info he asked for,
    yeah, my tsl122 has way to many buttons etc, but if i had a plexi i wouldnt ever be able to use it properly unless i lived a loooong way from any one else, ha ha , so the only button worth using (in my opinion) on my 100 watt marshall is the power reduction one, as it gives saturated 25 watt sound,
    cheers
    bruce
    :dead
    "someone that broke me up, with a corner of her smile"

    www.yz25098uk.tripod.com

  3. #83
    No problem, Bruce! I have a little fun with some of these posts as you know. We have everything here from hard core veterans with really nice guitars and Bad Cat amps to beginners who don't have much $$ and experience to go on. I try not to offend either camp...but have fun with both!

  4. #84
    Forum Member yz25098uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    east london
    Posts
    424
    tonefreak, im sorry if i came over not nice there, my fault,
    i didnt mean it to read so serious, youll find out i try to give what little info/help i can , and ask sh*tloads of often daft questions
    no probs m8!
    cheers mate,
    bruce
    :dead
    PS hopefully ther will be some rock/ blues basic kind of backing tracks in the playing section.
    "someone that broke me up, with a corner of her smile"

    www.yz25098uk.tripod.com

  5. #85
    I like Fezz! He's a diplomat on one hand and a die hard tube toting tone fiend on the other!

    He'll pat a kid or inexperienced player on the head and say..." That Cyber amp is WONDERFUL...wayyyy cool...!" and stuff like that. Then privately say to himself... " Teeheeee...better you than me plugging into that thing.." and sneak off and plug himself into a '66 Super! The Fezz is no dummy! :)

  6. #86
    fezz parka
    Guest
    Originally posted by Tonefreak
    I like Fezz! He's a diplomat on one hand and a die hard tube toting tone fiend on the other!

    Yep, I do love the old Fenders. :yay

  7. #87
    Forum Member VaughnC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Transylvania
    Posts
    59
    I think that the sound of an amp is only half the equation. I've heard quite a few solid state amps that subjectively sounded a lot like tube amps (while other people played them)....until I plugged into them myself. Yup, the tone was still very close with me playing them too....but the "feel" or tactile feedback from the solid state amp was just wrong, especially at gigging volume. Setting tone aside, has anyone else noticed how a tube amp just seems to breathe or bloom differently than a solid state amp? It's that "becoming part of the rig" (rather than just playing through a rig) thing that a good tube amp just does better at bringing out the best in my playing. And, if the tone and/or feel aren't quite right with my rig, I find it very distracting....and it definitly reflects itself in my playing.
    "Well hey....you're entitled to my opinion"

    Mr. TS9's place


  8. #88
    Originally posted by VaughnC
    Setting tone aside, has anyone else noticed how a tube amp just seems to breathe or bloom differently than a solid state amp?
    Yup!

  9. #89
    Forum Member BLUELOU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    FAR FROM LA LA LAND
    Posts
    2,101
    ILL CALL IT DEPTH AND COLOR AND DYNAMICS AND COMPRESSION

    SOLIDSTATE IS KOOL FOR DUDES LIKER DIMEONDBAG DARYLL BUT FOR ME I LIKE TUBERS PERSONALLY YET I DONT CARE WHA I USE AS LONG AS I GET PAID AND CAN GET A GOOD TONE


    IVE USED PODS IN STUDIO WORK AND LIKE THEM FOR EASE OF SETUPS AND GOT PRETTY DECENT TONES AND LAID MANY TRACKS DOWN GOT PAID MY SESSION $$$ AND LEFT
    SO I REALLY DONT CARE
    LIVE I PREFER OLD BASSMANS OR 45-50 WATT TUBE MARSHALLS

    TONEFUULLY
    BLUELOU
    GODBLESS
    DONT RIDE MY ASS
    I LIKE MAKIN $$$ NOT SPENDIN TONS OF WASTED TIME SETTIN UP AMPS
    I USE EVEN A OLD TECH 21 SANS AMP ORIGINAL LITTLE BLACK BOX WITH DIP SWITCHES
    MANY TIMES AS ITS SESSION WORK AND CHURCH SESSION WORK
    IF THE PERFORMER AND BAND MEMBERS WANT ME TO GO HOME BRING A TUBE AMP I WILL
    BUT AS FOR THE SETUP TIME IM NOT PAYIN WASTIN TIME ON MINE AND THEIR PART

    UNLESS I CUT SLAC
    K AND LIKE THE MUSICAL TRACKS OR BAND OR MUSICIANS IM HIRED FOR
    SO I'LL BRING MY FAV OL TUBE AMPS
    BUT IN MY ARSENAL GIG BAG I GOT A
    VERY OL TECH 21SANS AMP BLACK BOX I KNO INSIDE OUT
    AND A BUNCH OF PEDALS AND A OL MINI RED POD
    IT SOUNDS GOOD
    AND ITS EASY TO WORK WITH IN THE BOARD DIRECT
    SO IF THE HEADROOM IS THERE AND I GOT MY TUBE PREAMP I DONT CARE I MAY CARRY 5 PIECES OF SMALL GEAR IN MY GEAR BAG AND IT WORKS SUCESSFULLY
    NO COMPLAINTS
    IF I LUG A MARSHALL JTM45 SOMETIMES THE CHURCH OR HIRERS WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT A LITTLE AMP HISS OR BASSMAN HISS
    FOR ME
    ITS JUST FUN MAKIN MUSIC SOMETIMES I SESSION OUT FOR FREE FOR THE GOODNESS OF MY HEART AND LOVE OF MUSIC AND CHURCH

    MUSIC WISE
    I LIKE ALL ASPECTS OF IT
    TUBE OR SOLID STATE

    BUT AT HEART IM A OL BASSMAN FREAK
    ALWAYS WILL BE

    SO WHERE IS THE STRAW DRAWN ?
    MONEY TALKS
    ON GIGS I ONLY RELY ON MY OL TUBE AMPS
    BUT AS A HIRED STUDIO GUN FOR BASS OR GUITAR THE OL TECH 21 SANS AMP DIP SWITCHER BLACK BOX DOES THE JOB 90% TIME

    MAYBE I LUCK OUT I DONT KNO
    BUT I KNO THAT IT WORKS FOR ME
    I CANT COMPLAIN
    I DO LOVE OL TUBE AMPS PERSONALLY
    THE WAY THEY RESPOND AND SOUND
    BLUELOU

    :)
    SINCERELY
    BLUELOU
    GODBLESS

  10. #90
    Old Tele man
    Guest
    ...vacuum tube amps are sorta like the old "Hallmark Cards" slogan:

    "...when you CARE enough to play the very BEST!"
    Last edited by Old Tele man; 04-16-2004 at 09:52 PM.

  11. #91
    Forum Member melody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    The third coast..!
    Posts
    3,667

    the real difference

    is when you turn them up.

  12. #92
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    I'm certainly no expert...but in my experience it boils down to this:
    My Deluxe 85 SS sounds magnificent up to about 4, after that it starts to break up. As a bedroom amp, I coudn't ask anything more from it. Pinch harmonics and everything. At low volumes, my Super Reverb sounds fair at best. No real tone going on to make you turn your head. But, put it at 4 and above...and only then does it start to shine and give you that warmth. Keep going on the volume and that natural breakup is not brittle and harsh (like the SS), but warm and punchy. The logic of the waves being very sharp makes sense in theory, Tubes have always sounded warmer IMO.
    This is an age old discussion that will never end, but has only one answer...and that is: Play what makes you happy.

  13. #93

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    My father was a Radio-TV repairman in his spare time, and had more than a passing knowledge of vaccum tube vs. transistors ( old terms)! I always thought it was somewhat significant that he recognized the sound reproduction differences. I asked him once, in the early 70's, why my old Twin sounded so much rounder and richer than anything solid state to that point in time. His answer was that tubes would always produce a fatter, warmer tone, but that transistors would be cleaner and create more defined sine waves. This is how he broke it down: You have to think two thaings when listening to music, PRODUCTION and REPRODUCTION.

    Organ, Bass, Guitar, and even vocals will sound warmer, fuller, and not as harsh when "produced" by means of tube assisted amplification. The sound must first be created...guitar plugged into amp...and played. This happens to be why most studio players bring great tube amps into the studio with them.
    They are "creating the sound". This is the production of tone.

    The reproduction occurs when the finished product ( CD) is plugged into a device and played. This is where SS shines. It will pick up the production cleanly, stay cool longer, and be able to be managed easier.

    He then went on to say something pretty astute for back then.

    "Tube guitar amps are best for 'producing' the tone, solid state amps ( stereos) may best 'reproduce' that same sound..."

    Leading me to STILL believe what I've always heard with the ears...Tubes for musical instrument amps...transisitors for stereos!! Life is easy, isn't it? :)

  14. #94
    Forum Member NeoFauve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    in interesting times
    Posts
    12,530

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    That's a very cool breakdown, Toefreak.

    With an electric guitar, the amp is really a part of the instrument. So it's key in the "production" of the sound. Sort of like the material a reed on a saxophone is made of would matter to the player in how he/she is able to make the sound happen.

    I've noticed that my acoustics and my chambered & hollowbody guitars sound really good through a SS(keyboard) amp. In varying amounts, unplugged, they already have a voice. So they don't need as much help from an amp.
    BUt my strat and my tele are helpless without an amp. Through the SS they sound pretty anemic. Through a good tube amp, with the richness it adds, they become fullfledged instruments.

    Cool story, Tonefreak.
    "Well, I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused..."
    Elvis Costello

  15. #95

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Thanks, Neo. I really think that with electric guitars it's been proven too often, by too many great players, for too long, that tube amps just genereate superior sound production. At moderate levels, modelling amps even sound OK, but under pressure...the tube amps just shine.

    The Claptons, Vaughns, Knopflers, Masons and Paisleys of this world agree with the old man, so who am I to debate this?

    Stupid debate, really. You think Mark Sampson ( Matchless/ Badcat) Mike Soldano or Mike Zaite ( Dr Z) ever waste their time with this conversation. Probably far too busy selling and building amps for really good musicians with great ears!

    Call me when Badcat makes a SS amp!

  16. #96
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    7

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    I like the tighter... uh, tube-ier... sound of my toobs. Had a digi Vox... still have the line 6 flextone II... have a Trademark 10 (I do REALLY like that for my home)---but they're all different than my tube amps by far. WAY different to me. I have a Dr. Z, a Carr, a Traynor (soon to be two) and they easily sound different by far in my live settings than SS or digimon amps. It's pretty much up to the person who has to play it (and pay for it) that matters. Me, I like my tubes. Compared to the digi and SS amps I have, my vaccum tube amps are tighter, smoother (if that makes sense in the same description) and less "ickhy" than say the line 6 or tech 21 or vox. The digi SS amps are fine for certain applications and will surely be "there" someday soon. Until then, the 6v6s and kt66s and 6l6s and el84 I have smell sweet. Surely no audience will complain or scoff of your sound---I bought the amps for me but play for the audience. So... play on :}

  17. #97

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    You've got some great sounding amps there. What model of Dr Z are you playing through?

  18. #98
    Forum Member BLUELOU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    FAR FROM LA LA LAND
    Posts
    2,101

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    I LOVE MY OL TUBE AMPS
    I THINK VACUUM TUBES ADDS THE COLOR AND THE TONE
    TO ME ITS WARMER IN MY EARS PLUS MORE FUNNER THE MORE YOU TURN UP A TUBE AMP VOLUME WISE IT REACTS DYNAMICALLY DIFFERENT


    MANY NEW OLD STYLE POINT TO POINT HAND WIRED AMPS BOUTIQUE OR CUSTOM ONES
    THE MAIN OBJECTIVE TO A MUSICIAN IS THEIR EARS AND WANTS I MEAN ITS TOTALLY UP TO THE MUSICIAN
    IVE HEARD SOME GUITAR CATS USE SS AMPS AND THEY SOUNDED GREAT
    ITS OBJECTIVE HERE THERE IS TWO SIDES TO THE STORY
    TRANSISTORS SOLID STATE AMPS REACT DIFFERENT IN THE WAY THEY CLIP IF YOU WERE TO HONESTLY LOOK AT A OSCILLISCOPE ON THE TWO AMPS UNDER GUITAR LOADS

    TOTALL DIFFERENT BALLL GAME

    ITS HARD TO EXPLAIN FOR ME BUT VISUALLY SEE IT ON A SCOPE OR SINEWAVE IN TERMS
    IT IS WHAT WILL CONVINCE SOME TO TUBES THE CLIPPING ITS TOTALLY DIFFERENT THE WAY A TUBE REACTS AS ITS PUSHED IS MOSTLY PLEASING BUT ALSO I SEEN NICE FENDER TUBE AMPS AND A CRATE AND CARVIN TUBE AMP USIN CHINA PRE AMP 12AX7 TUBES
    ONCE I RE TUBED THE AMP WITH GROOVE TUBES IT WAS LIKE NIGHT AND DAY AS THEM CHINA TUBES WERE SO BRIGHT CHINSY AND TONALLY ANAL
    IM NOT KNOCIKIN ALL THEM BUT THE FENDER AMP WAS A HOT ROD DELUXE USIN FACTORY HOT ROD PRE AMP 12AX7 TUBES TILL I SEEN THEY SAID CHINA OR ONE WAS A REAL BRAND RUBE MADE IN CHINA
    GOOD TUBES OR GRADES OF TUBES MAKE A AMP SING ALSO

    SOLID STATE HAS THE HAND ON THIS WHERE WITH A GOOD EQ SECTION A SS AMP CAN WARM UP SOMETIMES PLUS THA SO CALLED RELIABILITY
    I DONT KNO ABOUT IT 100% CAUSE IN MY JC120 THE PWR TRANSISTORS WENT ONCE
    ITS OBJECTIONABLE TO ME
    TUBES BLOW AND SOME NICE EXPENSIVE NEWER TUBE AMPS ARE USIN CHINA TUBES AND CHEAPER TYPE ONES
    WANT RELIABILITY I GO WITH GT'S OR MILITARY SOVTEKS THEY ARE OK
    JJ EL84'S I LOVE
    BUT THEM REAL BRAND AND HOT ROD WHITE LOGO'D FENDER TUBES IM KINDA IMPARTIUAL TO
    I CHANGE THEM OUT I GOT ALOT OF OLD PREAMP TUBES I HUNT DOWN OLD CHURCH ORGANS AND THINGS LIKE THAT OL TVS ETC YOUD BE AMAZED WHA OL VS NEW TUBES SOUND LIKE ALSO
    LIKE I JUST TORE A OL BALDWIN ORGAN DOWN AND RAPED I THINK 22 12AX7'S A FEW AT7A'S ANS AT7'S AND ALL I CAN SAY IS 95% OF THEM WITH THE BALDWIN OLD WHITE LOGO ON THEM THESE BABIES WORK FINE I ONLY PULLED 2 BAD ONES

    MAIN POINT IS TO MY EARS I LIKE SOME OLD NICE TUBES LIKE MY OLD 6L6 RCA'S I GOT 2 PAIRS I KEEP IN HIDING
    I GOT 4 PAIRS OF OLD 6V6'S GC'S AND STUFF I FORGET THEYRE IN A DRAWER
    THE CARVIN AMP I WORKED ON IT WAS IN NEED OF A TUNEUP AND MAN THESE TUBES WERE VERY RESPONSIVE NOISY TO AMP BUMPING AND IT MADE NOISES
    THE PRE AMP TUBES WERE NOISY ALL TRACED TO THE FIRST ONE THAT WREAKED HAVOK ON THA AMP SIMPLE FIX
    ALL I AM SAYIN IS I LOVE TUBE AMPS I JUST CANT BELIEVE A TUBE CAN CHANGE THE WHOLE CHARACTER OF A AMPLIFIER

    I LIKE BOTH THERE IS GOOD IN BOTH BUT I DO PREFER TUBE FENDERS OR MARSHALLS OR VOXES AC30'S
    FOR ME

    TONEFREAK NOTED THE SAME DIFFERENCE I AM EXPLAINING ITS WHAT I FOUND OUT WHEN I WORKED IN MY UNCLES OLD TV REPAIR SHOP 20+YRS BACK
    THEY SHOWED ME A VISUAL DIFFERENCE NOT ONLY IN THE PHYSICAL NATURE OF THE 2 BEASTS
    BUT INB THE OSCILLISCOPE
    2 DIFFERENT MACHINES
    ITS UP TO THE MUSICIANS EARS
    I LIKE MY OLD FENDERS THE BEST ESPECIALLY 2 BASSSMAN HEADS I LOVE

    IM NOT KNOCKIN ANYTHING CAUSE I BET ERIC JOHNSON CAN MAKE A SS AMP SING
    I WILL NEVER DOUBT ANYONE MAKIN MONEY WITH SS AMPS LIKE ALBERT KING OR BB KING ETC IM SURE ALL THE JAZZ CATS USIN THEM ROLAND CUBES AND JC120'S ETC ARE FINE
    ITS JUST OPINIONS
    TO ME I HEAR THE TONAL DIFFERENCE AND KNO THE DYNAMICS OF A TUBE AMP AS OPPOSED TO A SS AMP IN MOST CASES
    RUSH ALEX LEIFSON WAS USIN ON VAPORTRAILS A VETTA STACK LIVE AT THE ST PETERSBURG ARENA HE SOUNDED GOOD

    ITS WEIRD
    THIS TOPIC IS OLD GOOD AND INTERESTING
    SINCERELY
    BLUELOU
    GODBLESS

  19. #99
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Yorktown, VA
    Posts
    227

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    BTTT

  20. #100
    Forum Member Constellation80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    462

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Well there's too much reading to read eveyones, but all I gotta say. On paper according to scientists bumbles bees can't fly. there too short to heavy and ther wing span isn't long enough.. And yet they fly. besides who says this article wasn't written by a engineer at a ss factory or something? lol What gets me in all the articles ii've read. That in the late 70's you couldn't give tubes amps away. No one wanted them. But companys like fender etc. Said no wait we think there awesome. they sound better. And where gonna give our customers a choice. And 10+ years later the customers have choosen. Now every ones following fenders lead. Besides "difference is a matter of perception. What he says are Subtile, I SAY ARE NIGHT AND DAY !

  21. #101
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Quote Originally Posted by Constellation80
    What gets me in all the articles ii've read. That in the late 70's you couldn't give tubes amps away. No one wanted them. But companys like fender etc. Said no wait we think there awesome.
    Well, not exactly the case.

    • Most professional rock folks at least preferred tubes in th elate 70's.
    • Most engineers didn't, because it was old technology, "more prone to failure," a large source of heat, etc..
    • CBS Fender would probably have preferred to sell pc-board SS amps, since the labor costs on the hand wired tube amps was dramatically rising.
    • Tube production was shutting down in the Western world.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  22. #102
    Forum Member Offshore Angler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New York Finger Lakes Area
    Posts
    8,467

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Quote Originally Posted by Constellation80
    On paper according to scientists bumbles bees can't fly. there too short to heavy and ther wing span isn't long enough.. And yet they fly.
    Huhhhhh??????

    The flight of the bumblebee is extremely well understood. As with most insects with paired wings, the vorticity induced by each pair interacts wit the other to creat the circulation.

    I have know idea where this myth occurred. I'm sure if you search the net you'll be able to find lots and lots on insect aerodynamics.

    'Course, I'm just one of those engineer/scientist types that deals with why things fly, so what would I know?
    "No harmonic knowledge, no sense of time, a ghastly tone, unskilled vibrato, and so on. Chuck is one of the worst guitar players I know" -Gravity Jim

  23. #103
    Forum Member NeoFauve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    in interesting times
    Posts
    12,530

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Bees are solid state, so inspite of their pudgy proportions they're light enough to fly.
    "Well, I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused..."
    Elvis Costello

  24. #104
    Forum Member Offshore Angler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New York Finger Lakes Area
    Posts
    8,467

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Aaaahhhhh! That's where the "can of angry bees" tone metaphor comes from. I get it.
    "No harmonic knowledge, no sense of time, a ghastly tone, unskilled vibrato, and so on. Chuck is one of the worst guitar players I know" -Gravity Jim

  25. #105
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    And I thought it was due to reduced mass due to the vacuum in their tubes.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  26. #106
    Forum Member Offshore Angler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New York Finger Lakes Area
    Posts
    8,467

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    I dig the SS crunch. I use lots and lots of SS in my signal for rock stuff, as it's part of the sound. Then I warm it up with a tube preamp and output section.

    Funny thing was, we saw lots of amps with tube preamps and SS power sections when the hybrids started coming out. That was all wrong. A SS preamp with a tube power stage would be exactly what most of us end up doing when we play live.


    Almost every player I see with a tube amp uses at least one SS device ahead of it in the signal chain. So it's really a moot point.
    "No harmonic knowledge, no sense of time, a ghastly tone, unskilled vibrato, and so on. Chuck is one of the worst guitar players I know" -Gravity Jim

  27. #107
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Quote Originally Posted by Offshore Angler
    Funny thing was, we saw lots of amps with tube preamps and SS power sections when the hybrids started coming out. That was all wrong. A SS preamp with a tube power stage would be exactly what most of us end up doing when we play live.
    That's mainly an 80's through current situation, since a low volt "marketing" style tube preamp is a lot cheaper to build.

    70's hybrids, like MusicMan and SG Systems were tube output with SS preamp.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  28. #108
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    So Calif
    Posts
    3,321

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Quote Originally Posted by NeoFauve
    <snip>
    I've noticed that my acoustics and my chambered & hollowbody guitars sound really good through a SS(keyboard) amp. In varying amounts, unplugged, they already have a voice. So they don't need as much help from an amp.
    BUt my strat and my tele are helpless without an amp. Through the SS they sound pretty anemic. Through a good tube amp, with the richness it adds, they become fullfledged instruments.
    Yeah, I agree. I've mostly played my archtop through SS amps. Lot of jazz players like Polytones for example. With a 335, Les Paul, Strat, Tele etc a tube amp seems to generally work better.

  29. #109
    Forum Member Constellation80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    462

    Re: tubes vs solid state - the real difference

    Well I'm startting to wonder where i learn this crap HAHA. your right it's a myth about the bumble bee thing "A long-held myth of the bumblebee was that, in terms of theoretical aerodynamics, it did not have the capacity (in terms of wing size or beat per second) to achieve flight with the degree of wing loading necessary. This myth became popular after an aerodynamicist in the 1930s stated that a bumblebee was not capable of flight. The statement was based upon an assumption that the bee's wing could be treated as a static aerofoil. However, in reality the bumblebee's flight is characterized by an oscillating wing that shares more characteristics with a helicopter rotor than an aeroplane wing." I found this on the net and it tells you where the myth comes from. Sorry guys. The point I was trying to make was that even though something either works or doesn't on paper. Often in real life it's a tottaly differn't thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •