Results 1 to 38 of 38

Thread: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

  1. #1
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Alright guys, which ones should I get? Who has used them? Any reason to choose one over the other? This is for a '57 twin reissue, thanks!

  2. #2
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    If I had to buy them, I'd get the Yellow Jackets, simply because they aren't sold by Groove Tubes.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    13

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    What is wrong with Groove tubes? I am curious not being a smart ass I do not know much about new tubes and people ask me all the time what is a reliable new tube and I always replay as far as I know there is not any.


    I stocked up in the 80s on the old stuff.

  4. #4
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Aspen Pittman is a huckster and a mojo man, selling snake oil at 2-3x the price.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  5. #5
    Forum Member wingnut1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Madtown
    Posts
    1,044

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    The Yellow Jackets will fit in the tube retainers easier than the Substi-Tubes.

  6. #6
    Forum Member crazy fingers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    St louis, MO
    Posts
    243

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I have some yellow jackets that I use on my dr reissue. You can kiss cleangoodbye, but man oh man it crunches with the best of them.
    Before I got them, I would always struggle with a useable crunch sound with my single coils. Not anymore.
    It should make your 57 sound like godzilla rampaging through tokyo.
    Nothin left to do but smile smile smile.....

  7. #7
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I bought my Yellow Jackets just a fewmonths ago.

    I'd buy them again because they were first in market, and should have/may have a patent or copyright.

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Statesboro, Georgia
    Posts
    1,168

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    What would these do in a Tweed Champ circuit? It might be fun to try one of these things once I get everything up and running. One of these days. (sigh....)


    I can't imagine them making the amp any crunchier.
    Got them Statesboro Blues

  9. #9
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by tugboat View Post
    What would these do in a Tweed Champ circuit? .
    It'd probably sound like crap, to be honest. They're not designed to be used in cathode biased amps.

    Essentially, what a Yellow Jacket does is:
    • Connects the pins of an octal tube to the corresponding pins for an EL84
    • Puts a capacitor on the grid, to strip away the bias voltage
    • Adds a big resistor (and capacitor?) to the cathode, to bias the tube.
    • Probably adds a screen resistor.
    Using a Yellow Jacket on an amp that's already cathode biased will bias the tube very cold.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  10. #10
    Forum Member wingnut1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Madtown
    Posts
    1,044

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    How will they sound on a 5F6A Bassman?

  11. #11
    Forum Member JJ Gross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Fort Hooterville, WI
    Posts
    295

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I have Substi-tubes.
    Personally I'm no fan of GT tubes, but the GT adapters include re-branded JJs with Groove Tube logos on them. Compared to the YJs, the STs are much heavier construction, almost mil-spec in design. They fit VERY tight in the socket and can stretch your sockets out to the point that when swapping back your original 6L6s, they'll just drop right out of the sockets.

    Internally, they're about the same. I use my STs without the metal jackets on the bases for 2 reasons. 1. They fit easily in the tube retainers this way. 2. They stay very cool as opposed to holding heat in the socket like the YJs or the STs with the base sleeves on.

    They sound awesome in my HRDx. The clean is nice & shimmery kind of like a Vox and none of the boxiness when cranked up. Extremely nice sound on clean. The drive channel sounds about half way between a Vox & a Marshall with no more flabbiness in the bass - tighter than a frog's ass. Lots of whollop & I'm really loving the HRDx now. You do lose a little clean headroom, but that's the EL84s doing that, not the converter base they're plugged into. You'll also notice the volumes on both channels no longer go straight from whisper to scream between 1 & 2. Going up to about 3 or 4 is normal now and a lot easier to control. All this without touching a soldering iron.

    I don't like them in my 78 Twin. To extreme of a change for my tastes. My Twin is slightly modded so I already have a handle on it's volume and I love the tone of it as-is. The EL84s just go too far, too much distortion, zero clean and the volume is about 1/4 of what it was with even just a pair of 6L6s in it.

    In the HRDx: Smashingly good. Love it to death with the EL84s in there.
    In the Twin: Don't like it - nope - don't like it one bit.

    Cheers,
    - JJ

    * Don't know about the YJs, but the STs drop the plate voltage down to 370v. Any El84 will cruise on that all day & the JJ EL84s don't even blink at that.
    "I bet your Momma was a tent-show Queen ..."

  12. #12
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    36

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I put substi-tubes into a Germino Rockgrinder, played for a while, then went back to KT-66's.

    Different tones & different volumes. If you're looking for a drop in volume, both are designed to do that. I can't compare the YJ to the ST as you've asked. You may simply need to ask if you want to change your volume AND your tone.

    Good luck with playing "the tube game". I still have the ST and will probably use them again...when I'm being yelled at for playing too loud with a non MV amp.

  13. #13

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    one character
    Last edited by superduper; 07-22-2007 at 02:37 PM.

  14. #14
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by superduper View Post
    I
    You can swap out a 6V6 for an EL84? yes?

    Someone mentioned 'twin', swap out a 6L6 for EL34 or EL84?

    I'd be interested in trying an EL84 in my SF champ.

    Interesting...

    - D
    Yep. You can use them in almost any amp. I've got one pair and have used them in my Hiwatt Custom 50, Marshall JTM45 RI, Vibrolux Reverb so far.

    For them to sound good in a twin you'd need to buy 4 (four) of them. That puts you in AC30 territory.

    Champ? That would just be silly. (and maybe not supported by the YJ due to bias circuit)

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    31

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilko View Post
    Yep. You can use them in almost any amp. I've got one pair and have used them in my Hiwatt Custom 50, Marshall JTM45 RI, Vibrolux Reverb so far.

    For them to sound good in a twin you'd need to buy 4 (four) of them. That puts you in AC30 territory.

    Champ? That would just be silly. (and maybe not supported by the YJ due to bias circuit)
    Wilko, did you notice any change in sound with the Hiwatt? I have been considering the yellow jackets for my Hiwatt 100 watt lead.
    Dave
    66' strat, 65'mustang, 73'tele custom,75' P bass, 81'bullet bass, 86' strat

  16. #16
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    four yellow jackets is going to be expensive...

    The amp sounds very much the same, but with a lower volume at breakup. I was pleasantly suprised. Retained much more Hiwatt sound than I expected.

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Statesboro, Georgia
    Posts
    1,168

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by superduper View Post
    I'm new to the whole YJ concept, my next step would be to check out the makers site, but since I've got actual users here...

    You can swap out a 6V6 for an EL84? yes?

    Someone mentioned 'twin', swap out a 6L6 for EL34 or EL84?

    Would it be sacralige to even contemplate trying these in a vintage super, even just for giggles?

    I'd be interested in trying an EL84 in my SF champ.

    Interesting...

    - D


    They advertise them as being 100% safe for any amp (with a slight tweak needed for cathode biased amps- I just checked them out at THD's site). Just pop 'em in and play apparently. Plugging them in is the only "mod" required, and you'd do that with 6L6s anyways. Besides, if Fezz does it to his vintage amps, they're safe to use.

    Nothing is being done to devalue the amp, after all you can pop the 6L6s back in any time you want, so its not sacrelige at all (unless you get an anal retentive vintage purist who insists that Super Reverbs are only supposed to be used with 6L6s). No harm to the amp, no modifications, no foul. Therefore, no sacrelidge.

    There's no way society would advance if we didn't tinker with everything. Leo himself was an incessant tinkerer.



    BTW, there is a small modification you need to do if you intend on using these things with a cathode biased amp like a champ (it involves moving a ground wire if I remember right). THD tells you what to do on their website. That's something I might try one day for the hell of it with my Tweed Champ clone actually. I can't imagine it dropping the headroom any (Champ? Headroom? ), but I do think it would be interesting to see how it changes the amp (one day when I'm bored and want to tinker).
    Got them Statesboro Blues

  18. #18
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    well I did end up getting the yellow jackets, just cause I was in a store that happened to sell them and they had them so I thought why not. They sound pretty good, I haven't really had a chance to use them a lot so I need to play with them some more.

  19. #19
    Forum Member JJ Gross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Fort Hooterville, WI
    Posts
    295

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    You can use a pair in a Twin - I have.
    I just didn't really care for the sound of it. Virtually zero clean and if I want a dirty amp, I certainly don't need a 112# combo to get it.
    I only run two tubes in the power section anyway. Just yank out either the inner or outer pair of power tubes and Viola` ... half power Twin.
    It's a TWIN fer cryin' out loud! Do you really need 4 6L6 bottles in there? ;)
    "I bet your Momma was a tent-show Queen ..."

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by JJ Gross View Post
    You can use a pair in a Twin - I have.
    I just didn't really care for the sound of it. Virtually zero clean and if I want a dirty amp, I certainly don't need a 112# combo to get it.
    I only run two tubes in the power section anyway. Just yank out either the inner or outer pair of power tubes and Viola` ... half power Twin.
    It's a TWIN fer cryin' out loud! Do you really need 4 6L6 bottles in there? ;)
    This is a '57 reissue twin, so it's only 40 watts with only 2 6L6s

  21. #21
    Forum Member holmis63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden.
    Posts
    283

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I´ve got a pair of those yellow yackets in my super twin reverb, actually real nice! If i set the eq neutral i still got a bit of headroom but it´s the dirty tones that is useful! In this case it was really necesery, 3 pairs of 6L6:s was way too much

  22. #22
    Forum Member 5er Driver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    94

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by JJ Gross View Post
    It's a TWIN fer cryin' out loud! Do you really need 4 6L6 bottles in there? ;)
    Right......I use 2 TAD ToneBones in my UL Twin. The Bones are a clone of the YJs & STs. If and when I need more clean volume I pop back in 2 or 4 6L6s
    The 5er Driver

    Now Annoying In
    ((((((Stereo))))))

    Plug that beotch in an' let her rip!

  23. #23
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Wow, this is an old post!!! But now that I'm here...let me ask just to confirm, I can use my yellow-jackets in my '65 deluxe reverb reissue right? I sold my '57 twin but I still have the yellow-jackets so I figure I can still put them to good use...

  24. #24
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    You can use them there and they will be just fine.

    It won't sound too different. I'd guess you'll lose some headroom and punch.

    I gotta try this...

  25. #25
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Ok, I just tried it and so far I can't tell much of a difference in my DRRI...but it's also kind of late so I didn't turn it up very loud either. One thing I did notice was that it is it makes a lot more noise now. I don't know if that's the nature of running class A or if my yellow-jackets are messed up, but it definitely is noisier now.

  26. #26
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Yellow Jackets do NOT run "Class A."

    They run cathode biased.

    There is a difference.

    A big difference.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  27. #27
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    616

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Did you folks hear that Fender has purchased and now owns Groove tubes.

  28. #28
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    It happened some time ago. It's not surprising. FMIC was absolutely GT's largest customer, I'd guess responsible for 50% or more of their sales. That's a lot of leverage.

    GT fits well into their portfolio. Big margins for average product.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  29. #29
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Kap'n View Post
    Yellow Jackets do NOT run "Class A."

    They run cathode biased.

    There is a difference.

    A big difference.
    TESTIFY!!!

  30. #30
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    608

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I run the YJ's in my BFVR. Fendery with a litte extra crunch when cranked. I find 'em real useful.

  31. #31
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Kap'n View Post
    Yellow Jackets do NOT run "Class A."

    They run cathode biased.

    There is a difference.

    A big difference.
    I'm not saying you are wrong, as I don't know too much on amplifiers, but why does the little instruction booklet that comes with them say it changes the amp from running class AB to class A?

  32. #32
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Thogthecaveman View Post
    I'm not saying you are wrong, as I don't know too much on amplifiers, but why does the little instruction booklet that comes with them say it changes the amp from running class AB to class A?
    Marketing.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  33. #33
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    for a very basic "rule of thumb" count the power tubes. Pairs are in most cases indicative of a swap in the cycle that is not "Class A"

  34. #34
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilko View Post
    for a very basic "rule of thumb" count the power tubes. Pairs are in most cases indicative of a swap in the cycle that is not "Class A"
    Pretty much. The only push-pull guitar amp I can think of that is Class A is Allessandro....maybe.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  35. #35
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    I didn't use the term push pull because I think that it's a misnomer.


    In class A the tubes does push and pull without rest. In paired operation that we call "push pull" they actually push push with breaks in between pushes. One pushes "up" (180) then the other pushes "down" (-180).

    right?

  36. #36
    Forum Member Kap'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where phony hippies meet
    Posts
    19,769

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    it's caled push pull because one side pushes while the other pulls & vice versa.
    Several guitars in different colors
    Things to make them fuzzy
    Things to make them louder
    orange picks

  37. #37
    Forum Member Wilko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,105

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    ah, thanks.

  38. #38
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    74

    Re: yellow jackets vs substi-tubes

    Marketing eh? I should have figured thanks for clearing it up for me!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •