Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Early Broadcaster

  1. #1
    Forum Member Tonefiend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    355

    Early Broadcaster

    Anyone ever play an early broadcaster with no truss rod?
    Me neither!

  2. #2
    Forum Member 1959burst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    in a vault full of rare vintage guitars
    Posts
    69
    yeah a buddy has one but unfortunately the neck has a twist in it!
    leo fender was a genius and he didn't even play the guitar, thank god for george fullerton! ADMINISTRAITOR OF THE MESA/BOOGIE FORUM

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    104
    The first good guitar that I ever got to play was a Broadcaster. It belonged to my Mom's cousin. I learned to play on it. He died a few years ago and the guitar was sold before I had a chance to buy it. I really wanted that guitar. It has a JM brand on the back of the headstock. My cousin was a rancher.

  4. #4
    Forum Member Tonefiend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    355
    Lentz and I have a no rod neck we made up. The idea has been kicked around to use it with the pine body to see what it sounds like. I found some great pine also.
    I wouldn't worry about the twisting. The board can be leveled to acomodate for the tension. somthing they probably didn't have down well in the '40s!

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    59

    I didn't know...

    they made any Broadcasters without trussrods ? The fisrt ones were Esquire's , they didn't have the trussrod route. Fender bought the truss rod routing plate ooctober 3rd 1950 , before they made the first Broadcaster. Tonefiend was this some kind of trick question? lol.

  6. #6
    Forum Member professor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Trenton, NJ
    Posts
    62
    I've got a '27 Martin 0-18K, and a '41 Gibson L-50, both with big-assed necks without truss rods... BOTH play and sound wonderful, and are a treat to play. No truss rod also makes the guitars balance a bit better, IMO...
    Regards, Dave Orban

  7. #7
    Forum Member John Catto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    47
    I've played a couple of early Broadcasters, they both had Truss rods. I think qtipburst is right 2 pickup esquire = no truss rod. Ever notice how thin the necks are on some of the Broadcasters, not at all like the ones they did even 6 months later.

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    59

    Yeah

    they had black painted body that were a little bit thicker than standard issue.
    The necks were huge with no rod. I don't know how many they made , but they were $$$. You see them from time to time for sale for under $2K. The pups might be custom wound , and they came with all kinds of goodies and two cases too boot. A big package.

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    28
    You are correct, qtipburst. The earliest Esquires had no truss rods, because Leo Fender felt that the massive necks (~1" thick) would be able to handle the string tension with no problem.

    The Custom Shop pine body reissue guitars are Esquires, too.

  10. #10
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Standin' at the crossroads, shoutin' at the devil.
    Posts
    177
    I wonder if anyone has ever ordered a Broadcaster RI without a truss rod from the Custom Shop. Hmm...

  11. #11
    Forum Member Guildx700~'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Way down by teh methane sea~
    Posts
    216
    Professor, my 1939 Gibson L50 has a truss rod, what's up with your 41?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •